Access to reliable and promptly available agricultural extension services has been an unwavering driving force to rural poverty alleviation. The ever-accelerating growth rate, which has culminated in a population boom, rapidly expanding fluctuations in technology usage, a substantial increase in livelihood concerns, and the impact of climate change, has dictated the need for a comprehensive and urgent analysis of current approaches to extension service delivery.
The provision of extension services for a community by a number of different providers of extended services is referred to as a pluralistic extension system.
Key Principles of Pluralistic Agricultural Extension:
Multiplicity of Extension Providers:
Pluralism supports a diverse set of extension providers, comprising government bodies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), farmer groups, private firms, and community-based organisations, to be involved in extension services. Farmers can have access to a more extensive range of information and resources as a result of this diversification.
Active Participatory Learning:
Pluralistic extension promotes farmers' active participation in the decision-making process and dissemination of knowledge. Participatory methods such as farmer field schools, community training sessions, and collaborative learning are promoted.
Customised Solutions:
Instead of making blanket suggestions, a pluralistic approach customises advice and strategies, according to the distinctive needs of the individual farmer and farming community and the resources available.
Local Conditions:
Pluralism recognises the significance of local settings in agriculture. It considers ecological resources, cultural factors, and social elements that impact agricultural practises and tailors extension services appropriately.
Advantages of a Pluralistic Approach:
More farmers, especially those in distant or marginalised areas, can gain access to knowledge and support through diversifying extension services and practises.
Pluralism promotes innovation by encouraging the sharing of ideas and methods among the actors providing extension services which results in an increase in the adoption and utilization of new technologies and practices.
Farmers that are provided with diverse extension services are more positioned to adjust to changing climatic instances and market dynamics, which increases their capacity for resiliency.
The pluralistic approach empowers farmers by incorporating them in decision-making processes and boosting their ability to make sound choices regarding their agricultural practices.
Conclusion:
Agricultural extension is critical to improving agricultural production, environmental sustainability, and rural development. Top-down, government-driven approaches have consistently ruled extension services. The limited number of extension workers in the public sector and the constantly increasing population of the farming community are heavily impacting the extension services. So, in the midst of different farming systems, altering agricultural settings, and expanding social requirements, the limits of the earlier extension strategies have become increasingly obvious. A pluralistic approach to agriculture extension has emerged as a potential choice in response to these concerns.
A pluralistic extension system will not only help to decrease the gap in the ratio of extension workers to farmers but will also help to lessen the economic burden of the national government.
Source: Krishi Jagran